{"id":19313,"date":"2020-08-04T09:46:37","date_gmt":"2020-08-04T07:46:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/plan-de-reprise-de-lactivite-post-confinement-consultation-du-cse-et-trouble-manifestement-illicite-une-nouvelle-decision-du-tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre\/"},"modified":"2022-09-19T14:48:12","modified_gmt":"2022-09-19T12:48:12","slug":"plan-de-reprise-de-lactivite-post-confinement-consultation-du-cse-et-trouble-manifestement-illicite-une-nouvelle-decision-du-tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/plan-de-reprise-de-lactivite-post-confinement-consultation-du-cse-et-trouble-manifestement-illicite-une-nouvelle-decision-du-tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre\/","title":{"rendered":"Plan de reprise de l\u2019activit\u00e9 post-confinement, consultation du CSE et trouble manifestement illicite : une nouvelle d\u00e9cision du Tribunal judiciaire de Nanterre"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"color: black;\">Apr\u00e8s la p\u00e9riode du confinement o\u00f9 la quasi-totalit\u00e9 des salari\u00e9s avait \u00e9t\u00e9 plac\u00e9e en t\u00e9l\u00e9travail et\/ou en activit\u00e9 partielle, la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 Groupe Moniteur (groupe de presse) a \u00e9labor\u00e9 un Plan de reprise d\u2019activit\u00e9 selon des \u00ab\u00a0stades pand\u00e9miques\u00a0\u00bb dit 1, 2 et 3.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: black;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: black;\">Apr\u00e8s avoir inform\u00e9 et consult\u00e9 son CSE sur le Plan de reprise d\u2019activit\u00e9 et notamment la mise en \u0153uvre du stade 1, la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 Groupe Moniteur a annonc\u00e9 aux \u00e9lus la d\u00e9cision de passer au stade 2, sans consultation pr\u00e9alable \u00e0 la prise de d\u00e9cision (tout en ouvrant une consultation sur le stade 2 post\u00e9rieurement \u00e0 l\u2019annonce de la d\u00e9cision de mise en \u0153uvre).\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: black;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: black;\">Le CSE a assign\u00e9 d\u2019heure \u00e0 heure la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 Groupe Moniteur devant le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s du Tribunal judiciaire de Nanterre d\u2019une demande tendant \u00e0 ce qu\u2019il soit ordonn\u00e9 \u00e0 la soci\u00e9t\u00e9, sous astreinte de 50.000 \u20ac par jour de retard, de suspendre le passage au stade 2 du Plan de reprise d\u2019activit\u00e9 dans l\u2019attente de la consultation du CSE. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: black;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: black;\">De son c\u00f4t\u00e9, la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 contestait notamment l\u2019existence d\u2019un engagement de sa part de consulter le CSE lors du passage au stade 2 et consid\u00e9rait avoir respect\u00e9 ses obligations d\u00e8s lors qu\u2019une consultation du CSE \u00e9tait en tout \u00e9tat de cause pr\u00e9vue sur le stade 2.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: black;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: black;\">Le Tribunal a rejet\u00e9 la position de la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 et a fait droit \u00e0 la demande du CSE de voir prononcer une astreinte de 50.000 \u20ac par jour de retard. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: black;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: black;\">Commen\u00e7ant par rappeler que le CSE est obligatoirement inform\u00e9 et consult\u00e9 sur les questions concernant l\u2019organisation, la gestion et la marche g\u00e9n\u00e9rale de l\u2019entreprise, le Tribunal a consid\u00e9r\u00e9 que la d\u00e9cision de passer au stade 2 du Plan de reprise concernait les effectifs et les conditions de travail des salari\u00e9s et devait, de ce fait, \u00eatre pr\u00e9c\u00e9d\u00e9e d\u2019une information et d\u2019une consultation pr\u00e9alables du CSE. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: black;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: black;\">Le Tribunal, s\u2019inscrivant dans la ligne de la jurisprudence \u00ab\u00a0Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 G\u00e9n\u00e9rale\u00a0\u00bb (Cass. soc. 7 f\u00e9v. 1996, n\u00b0 93-18.756)<\/span><strong style=\"color: black;\"><\/strong><span style=\"color: black;\">a pr\u00e9cis\u00e9 que lorsque la mesure s\u2019inscrit dans une proc\u00e9dure complexe comportant des d\u00e9cisions \u00e9chelonn\u00e9es, le CSE doit \u00eatre consult\u00e9 \u00e0 l\u2019occasion de chacune d\u2019elles. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: black;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: black;\">La soci\u00e9t\u00e9 n\u2019ayant pas consult\u00e9 le CSE avant la mise en \u0153uvre du passage au stade 2 du Plan de reprise, le Tribunal a consid\u00e9r\u00e9 qu\u2019elle avait commis un trouble manifestement illicite.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: black;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><em style=\"color: black;\">Tribunal judiciaire de Nanterre, ordonnance du 15 juillet 2020, RG n\u00b0 20\/01157, CSE Groupe Moniteur c\/ SAS Groupe Moniteur<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Plan de reprise de l\u2019activit\u00e9 post-confinement, consultation du CSE et trouble manifestement illicite : une nouvelle d\u00e9cision du Tribunal judiciaire de Nanterre<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":19311,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_seopress_robots_follow":"","_seopress_robots_imageindex":"","_seopress_robots_snippet":"","_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_robots_breadcrumbs":"","_seopress_robots_freeze_modified_date":"","_seopress_robots_custom_modified_date":"","_seopress_robots_canonical":"","_seopress_social_fb_title":"","_seopress_social_fb_desc":"","_seopress_social_fb_img":"","_seopress_social_fb_img_attachment_id":0,"_seopress_social_fb_img_width":0,"_seopress_social_fb_img_height":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_title":"","_seopress_social_twitter_desc":"","_seopress_social_twitter_img":"","_seopress_social_twitter_img_attachment_id":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_img_width":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_img_height":0,"_seopress_redirections_value":"","_seopress_redirections_enabled":"","_seopress_redirections_enabled_regex":"","_seopress_redirections_logged_status":"","_seopress_redirections_param":"","_seopress_redirections_type":0,"_seopress_analysis_target_kw":"","_seopress_news_disabled":"","_seopress_video_disabled":"","_seopress_video":[],"_seopress_pro_schemas_manual":[],"_seopress_pro_rich_snippets_disable_all":"","_seopress_pro_rich_snippets_disable":[],"_seopress_pro_schemas":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[31],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-19313","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-actualites-en-droit-social"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19313","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=19313"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19313\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/19311"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=19313"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=19313"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=19313"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}