{"id":19605,"date":"2020-12-23T07:26:13","date_gmt":"2020-12-23T06:26:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/indemnisation-dun-prejudice-distinct-en-cas-de-licenciement-justifie-intervenu-dans-des-circonstances-vexatoires\/"},"modified":"2022-09-19T14:48:46","modified_gmt":"2022-09-19T12:48:46","slug":"indemnisation-dun-prejudice-distinct-en-cas-de-licenciement-justifie-intervenu-dans-des-circonstances-vexatoires","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/indemnisation-dun-prejudice-distinct-en-cas-de-licenciement-justifie-intervenu-dans-des-circonstances-vexatoires\/","title":{"rendered":"Indemnisation d\u2019un pr\u00e9judice distinct en cas de licenciement justifi\u00e9 intervenu dans des circonstances vexatoires"},"content":{"rendered":"

La Cour de cassation, dans un arr\u00eat du 16 d\u00e9cembre dernier, a consid\u00e9r\u00e9 que \u00ab\u00a0<\/span>m\u00eame lorsqu\u2019il est justifi\u00e9 par une faute grave du salari\u00e9, le licenciement peut causer \u00e0 celui-ci, en raison des circonstances vexatoires qui l\u2019ont accompagn\u00e9, un pr\u00e9judice dont il est fond\u00e9 \u00e0 demander r\u00e9paration<\/em>\u00a0\u00bb (Cass. soc. 16 d\u00e9cembre 2020, n\u00b018-23.966).<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, un salari\u00e9 licenci\u00e9 pour faute grave a sollicit\u00e9 des dommages et int\u00e9r\u00eats pour rupture de son contrat de travail dans des conditions vexatoires, en faisant valoir que son employeur s\u2019\u00e9tait r\u00e9pandu en public sur les motifs de son licenciement, en pr\u00e9tendant qu\u2019il prenait de la drogue et qu\u2019il \u00e9tait un voleur, ce qui lui avait caus\u00e9 un pr\u00e9judice distinct de celui r\u00e9sultant de la perte de son emploi.<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

La Cour d\u2019appel de Rennes a jug\u00e9 que les griefs reproch\u00e9s au salari\u00e9 constituaient un manquement flagrant \u00e0 ses obligations contractuelles, notamment de loyaut\u00e9, de nature \u00e0 justifier son licenciement pour faute grave et l\u2019a d\u00e9bout\u00e9 de sa demande de dommages et int\u00e9r\u00eats pour licenciement vexatoire.<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Ce raisonnement est censur\u00e9 par la Cour de cassation aux termes d\u2019un arr\u00eat du 16 d\u00e9cembre 2020, promis \u00e0 une large diffusion.<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Selon la Haute juridiction, la Cour d\u2019appel aurait d\u00fb \u00ab\u00a0<\/span>rechercher, comme elle y \u00e9tait invit\u00e9e, si le licenciement n\u2019avait pas \u00e9t\u00e9 entour\u00e9 de circonstances vexatoires<\/em>\u00a0\u00bb.<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Le contexte vexatoire d\u2019un licenciement peut ainsi justifier une r\u00e9paration sp\u00e9cifique, m\u00eame si le licenciement du salari\u00e9 est par ailleurs justifi\u00e9.<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/jurisprudence_2\/chambre_sociale_576\/1203_16_46108.html<\/a>\u00a0<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Indemnisation d\u2019un pr\u00e9judice distinct en cas de licenciement justifi\u00e9 intervenu dans des circonstances vexatoires<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":19603,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_seopress_robots_follow":"","_seopress_robots_imageindex":"","_seopress_robots_snippet":"","_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_robots_breadcrumbs":"","_seopress_robots_freeze_modified_date":"","_seopress_robots_custom_modified_date":"","_seopress_robots_canonical":"","_seopress_social_fb_title":"","_seopress_social_fb_desc":"","_seopress_social_fb_img":"","_seopress_social_fb_img_attachment_id":0,"_seopress_social_fb_img_width":0,"_seopress_social_fb_img_height":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_title":"","_seopress_social_twitter_desc":"","_seopress_social_twitter_img":"","_seopress_social_twitter_img_attachment_id":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_img_width":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_img_height":0,"_seopress_redirections_value":"","_seopress_redirections_enabled":"","_seopress_redirections_enabled_regex":"","_seopress_redirections_logged_status":"","_seopress_redirections_param":"","_seopress_redirections_type":0,"_seopress_analysis_target_kw":"","_seopress_news_disabled":"","_seopress_video_disabled":"","_seopress_video":[],"_seopress_pro_schemas_manual":[],"_seopress_pro_rich_snippets_disable_all":"","_seopress_pro_rich_snippets_disable":[],"_seopress_pro_schemas":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[31],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-19605","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-actualites-en-droit-social"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19605","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=19605"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19605\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/19603"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=19605"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=19605"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=19605"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}