{"id":20216,"date":"2021-12-06T09:04:24","date_gmt":"2021-12-06T08:04:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/reintegration-apres-un-licenciement-nul-acquisition-de-conges-payes-au-titre-de-la-periode-deviction\/"},"modified":"2022-09-19T14:49:59","modified_gmt":"2022-09-19T12:49:59","slug":"reintegration-apres-un-licenciement-nul-acquisition-de-conges-payes-au-titre-de-la-periode-deviction","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/reintegration-apres-un-licenciement-nul-acquisition-de-conges-payes-au-titre-de-la-periode-deviction\/","title":{"rendered":"R\u00e9int\u00e9gration apr\u00e8s un licenciement nul : acquisition de cong\u00e9s pay\u00e9s au titre de la p\u00e9riode d\u2019\u00e9viction"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"ql-align-justify\"><span style=\"color: black;\">Dans l\u2019esp\u00e8ce ayant donn\u00e9 lieu \u00e0 l&rsquo;arr\u00eat de la Cour de cassation, en date du 1er d\u00e9cembre dernier, un salari\u00e9 a \u00e9t\u00e9 victime d\u2019un accident du travail le 24 juin 2010 et plac\u00e9 en arr\u00eat de travail jusqu\u2019au 5 juillet suivant. Il a \u00e9t\u00e9 licenci\u00e9 pour insuffisance professionnelle le 10 ao\u00fbt 2012.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"ql-align-justify\">\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"ql-align-justify\"><span style=\"color: black;\">Contestant son licenciement, il a saisi la juridiction prud\u2019homale.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"ql-align-justify\">\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"ql-align-justify\"><span style=\"color: black;\">La Cour d\u2019appel de Paris a consid\u00e9r\u00e9 que le licenciement du salari\u00e9 devait \u00eatre annul\u00e9, mais la p\u00e9riode d\u2019\u00e9viction, correspondant \u00e0 la p\u00e9riode entre l\u2019\u00e9viction du salari\u00e9 de l\u2019entreprise et sa r\u00e9int\u00e9gration, n\u2019ouvrait pas droit \u00e0 acquisition de jours de cong\u00e9s pay\u00e9s.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"ql-align-justify\"><\/p>\n<p class=\"ql-align-justify\"><span style=\"color: black; background-color: rgb(250, 250, 250);\">Ce raisonnement a \u00e9t\u00e9 censur\u00e9 par la Cour de cassation.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"ql-align-justify\"><\/p>\n<p class=\"ql-align-justify\"><span style=\"color: black; background-color: rgb(250, 250, 250);\">Aux termes d\u2019un arr\u00eat du 1<\/span><sup style=\"color: black; background-color: rgb(250, 250, 250);\">er<\/sup><span style=\"color: black; background-color: rgb(250, 250, 250);\"> d\u00e9cembre 2021 (n\u00b019-24.766), la Cour de cassation a jug\u00e9 que \u00ab\u00a0<\/span><em style=\"color: black; background-color: rgb(250, 250, 250);\">sauf lorsque le salari\u00e9 a occup\u00e9 un autre emploi durant la p\u00e9riode d\u2019\u00e9viction comprise entre la date du licenciement nul et celle de sa r\u00e9int\u00e9gration dans son emploi, il peut pr\u00e9tendre \u00e0 ses droits \u00e0 cong\u00e9s pay\u00e9s au titre de cette p\u00e9riode en application des dispositions des articles L. 3141-3 et L.3141-9 du code du travail\u00a0<\/em><span style=\"color: black; background-color: rgb(250, 250, 250);\">\u00bb.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"ql-align-justify\"><\/p>\n<p class=\"ql-align-justify\"><span style=\"color: black; background-color: rgb(250, 250, 250);\">Cette d\u00e9cision constitue un revirement de jurisprudence. Jusqu&rsquo;alors, la Haute juridiction avait, en effet, jug\u00e9 que la p\u00e9riode d\u2019\u00e9viction ouvrant droit, non \u00e0 une acquisition de jours de cong\u00e9s, mais \u00e0 une indemnit\u00e9 d\u2019\u00e9viction, le salari\u00e9 ne pouvait b\u00e9n\u00e9ficier effectivement de jours de cong\u00e9s pour cette p\u00e9riode (Cass. soc. 11 mai 2017, n\u00b015-19.731\u00a0; Cass. soc. 30 janvier 2019, n\u00b016-25.672).\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"ql-align-justify\"><\/p>\n<p class=\"ql-align-justify\"><span style=\"color: black; background-color: rgb(250, 250, 250);\">Ce revirement de jurisprudence fait suite \u00e0 une d\u00e9cision de la CJUE du 25 juin 2020 qui consid\u00e9rait qu\u2019un travailleur avait droit, pour la p\u00e9riode comprise entre son licenciement ill\u00e9gal et sa r\u00e9int\u00e9gration dans son ancien emploi, aux cong\u00e9s pay\u00e9s correspondants ou, au terme de sa relation de travail, \u00e0 une indemnit\u00e9 de cong\u00e9s pay\u00e9s (CJUE, 25 juin 2020, aff. C-762\/18 et C-37\/19).<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"ql-align-justify\"><\/p>\n<p class=\"ql-align-justify\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/61a71e864f1c1ce287fde60b?judilibre_chambre%5B0%5D=soc\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"color: black; background-color: rgb(250, 250, 250);\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/61a71e864f1c1ce287fde60b?judilibre_chambre%5B0%5D=soc<\/a><\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>R\u00e9int\u00e9gration apr\u00e8s un licenciement nul : acquisition de cong\u00e9s pay\u00e9s au titre de la p\u00e9riode d\u2019\u00e9viction<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":20214,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_seopress_robots_follow":"","_seopress_robots_imageindex":"","_seopress_robots_snippet":"","_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_robots_breadcrumbs":"","_seopress_robots_freeze_modified_date":"","_seopress_robots_custom_modified_date":"","_seopress_robots_canonical":"","_seopress_social_fb_title":"","_seopress_social_fb_desc":"","_seopress_social_fb_img":"","_seopress_social_fb_img_attachment_id":0,"_seopress_social_fb_img_width":0,"_seopress_social_fb_img_height":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_title":"","_seopress_social_twitter_desc":"","_seopress_social_twitter_img":"","_seopress_social_twitter_img_attachment_id":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_img_width":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_img_height":0,"_seopress_redirections_value":"","_seopress_redirections_enabled":"","_seopress_redirections_enabled_regex":"","_seopress_redirections_logged_status":"","_seopress_redirections_param":"","_seopress_redirections_type":0,"_seopress_analysis_target_kw":"","_seopress_news_disabled":"","_seopress_video_disabled":"","_seopress_video":[],"_seopress_pro_schemas_manual":[],"_seopress_pro_rich_snippets_disable_all":"","_seopress_pro_rich_snippets_disable":[],"_seopress_pro_schemas":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[31],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-20216","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-actualites-en-droit-social"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20216","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=20216"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20216\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/20214"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=20216"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=20216"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=20216"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}