{"id":24351,"date":"2024-02-28T14:01:07","date_gmt":"2024-02-28T13:01:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/?p=24351"},"modified":"2024-02-28T14:01:08","modified_gmt":"2024-02-28T13:01:08","slug":"lenquete-interne-un-outil-a-manier-avec-precautions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/lenquete-interne-un-outil-a-manier-avec-precautions\/","title":{"rendered":"L\u2019enqu\u00eate interne : un outil \u00e0 manier avec pr\u00e9cautions !"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Dans un arr\u00eat  du 7 f\u00e9vrier 2024 (n\u00b021\/00413), la Cour d&rsquo;appel de Metz a \u00e9cart\u00e9 les conclusions d\u2019une enqu\u00eate r\u00e9alis\u00e9e par l\u2019employeur, qualifi\u00e9es de \u00ab\u00a0<em>peu pertinentes<\/em>\u00a0\u00bb.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>Dans cette esp\u00e8ce, le 10 septembre 2018, une salari\u00e9e a pis acte de la rupture de son contrat de travail et a notamment soutenu avoir \u00e9t\u00e9 victime de faits de harc\u00e8lement moral et de harc\u00e8lement sexuel.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>Le 9 juillet 2019, elle a saisi le Conseil de prud\u2019hommes en requalification de sa prise d\u2019acte en un licenciement nul.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>La Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 a r\u00e9alis\u00e9 une enqu\u00eate interne et \u00e9tabli un rapport le 23 septembre suivant, concluant \u00e0 l\u2019absence de harc\u00e8lement moral, mais \u00e0 des \u00ab\u00a0<em>pratiques manag\u00e9riales adapt\u00e9es \u00e0 la situation et au comportement de la salari\u00e9e<\/em>\u00a0\u00bb, ainsi qu\u2019\u00e0 l\u2019absence de harc\u00e8lement sexuel.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>Le Conseil de prud\u2019hommes a rejet\u00e9 les demandes de la salari\u00e9e, qui a alors relev\u00e9 appel de la d\u00e9cision ainsi rendue.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>La Cour d\u2019appel de Metz, dans l&rsquo;arr\u00eat pr\u00e9cit\u00e9 du 7 f\u00e9vrier 20\u00e9&rsquo;? a fait droit aux demandes de la salari\u00e9e, en retenant notamment que \u00ab\u00a0<em>les conclusions du rapport ne sont pas pertinentes<\/em>\u00a0\u00bb.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>A l\u2019appui de cette constatation, les juges d\u2019appels ont\u00a0:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>constat\u00e9 que l\u2019enqu\u00eate avait \u00e9t\u00e9 diligent\u00e9e un an apr\u00e8s la prise d\u2019acte de la salari\u00e9e,<\/li>\n<li>l\u2019enqu\u00eate avait \u00e9t\u00e9 r\u00e9alis\u00e9e alors qu\u2019elle avait d\u00e9j\u00e0 engag\u00e9e une action prud\u2019homale,<\/li>\n<li>les auditions r\u00e9alis\u00e9es se limitaient aux 2 personnes mises en cause et 2 t\u00e9moins d\u00e9sign\u00e9s par les mis en cause,<\/li>\n<li>la salari\u00e9e ayant signal\u00e9 les agissements n\u2019avait pas manifest\u00e9 son souhait de participer \u00e0 cette enqu\u00eate et n\u2019avait donc pas \u00e9t\u00e9 re\u00e7ue en entretien,<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>ces \u00e9l\u00e9ments \u00e9tant \u00ab\u00a0<em>peu compatibles avec un objectif d\u2019efficacit\u00e9 et d\u2019impartialit\u00e9<\/em>\u00a0\u00bb.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>Cet arr\u00eat est susceptible de faire l&rsquo;objet d&rsquo;un pourvoi en cassation.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>En l&rsquo;\u00e9tat, il convient de rappeler, entre autres, qu\u2019en cas de signalement d\u2019agissements susceptibles de constituer un harc\u00e8lement moral ou harc\u00e8lement sexuel, l\u2019employeur doit r\u00e9agir dans les plus brefs d\u00e9lais sous peine de manquer notamment \u00e0 son obligation de s\u00e9curit\u00e9.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Dans un arr\u00eat du 7 f\u00e9vrier 2024 (n\u00b021\/00413), la Cour d&rsquo;appel de Metz a \u00e9cart\u00e9 les conclusions d\u2019une enqu\u00eate r\u00e9alis\u00e9e par l\u2019employeur, qualifi\u00e9es de \u00ab\u00a0peu pertinentes\u00a0\u00bb.\u00a0 Dans cette esp\u00e8ce, le 10 septembre 2018, une salari\u00e9e a pis acte de la rupture de son contrat de travail et a notamment soutenu avoir \u00e9t\u00e9 victime de faits [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":24349,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_seopress_robots_follow":"","_seopress_robots_imageindex":"","_seopress_robots_snippet":"","_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_robots_breadcrumbs":"","_seopress_robots_freeze_modified_date":"","_seopress_robots_custom_modified_date":"","_seopress_robots_canonical":"","_seopress_social_fb_title":"","_seopress_social_fb_desc":"","_seopress_social_fb_img":"","_seopress_social_fb_img_attachment_id":0,"_seopress_social_fb_img_width":0,"_seopress_social_fb_img_height":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_title":"","_seopress_social_twitter_desc":"","_seopress_social_twitter_img":"","_seopress_social_twitter_img_attachment_id":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_img_width":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_img_height":0,"_seopress_redirections_value":"","_seopress_redirections_enabled":"","_seopress_redirections_enabled_regex":"","_seopress_redirections_logged_status":"","_seopress_redirections_param":"","_seopress_redirections_type":0,"_seopress_analysis_target_kw":"","_seopress_news_disabled":"","_seopress_video_disabled":"","_seopress_video":[],"_seopress_pro_schemas_manual":[],"_seopress_pro_rich_snippets_disable_all":"","_seopress_pro_rich_snippets_disable":[],"_seopress_pro_schemas":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[31],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-24351","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-actualites-en-droit-social"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24351","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=24351"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24351\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/24349"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=24351"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=24351"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=24351"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}