{"id":25089,"date":"2024-05-16T11:59:20","date_gmt":"2024-05-16T09:59:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/?p=25089"},"modified":"2024-05-16T12:07:30","modified_gmt":"2024-05-16T10:07:30","slug":"effet-de-la-saisine-du-conseil-de-discipline-sur-le-delai-de-notification-dune-sanction-disciplinaire","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/effet-de-la-saisine-du-conseil-de-discipline-sur-le-delai-de-notification-dune-sanction-disciplinaire\/","title":{"rendered":"Effet de la saisine du conseil de discipline sur le d\u00e9lai de notification d&rsquo;une sanction disciplinaire"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"ql-align-justify\"><span style=\"color: black;\">Dans une esp\u00e8ce ayant donn\u00e9 lieu \u00e0 un arr\u00eat de la Cour de cassation du 2 mai 2024, la salari\u00e9e, engag\u00e9e par la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 A. F., avait \u00e9t\u00e9 inform\u00e9e, par lettre du 16 d\u00e9cembre 2016, de la saisine du conseil de discipline et avait \u00e9t\u00e9 convoqu\u00e9e devant cette instance le 12 janvier 2017.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"ql-align-justify\"><\/p>\n<p class=\"ql-align-justify\"><span style=\"color: black;\">Par lettre du 28 d\u00e9cembre 2016, elle avait exprim\u00e9 son opposition \u00e0 la tenue du conseil de discipline. Licenci\u00e9e pour faute grave par lettre du 4 janvier 2017, elle avait saisi la juridiction prud&rsquo;homale de demandes au titre de l&rsquo;ex\u00e9cution et de la rupture de son contrat de travail.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"ql-align-justify\"><\/p>\n<p class=\"ql-align-justify\"><span style=\"color: black;\">La salari\u00e9e faisait notamment valoir le non-respect du d\u00e9lai d\u2019un mois pour notifier une sanction disciplinaire, sur le fondement de l\u2019article L.1332-2 du code du travail. Cet argument avait \u00e9t\u00e9 accueilli par la cour d\u2019appel. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"ql-align-justify\"><\/p>\n<p class=\"ql-align-justify\"><span style=\"color: black;\">La Cour de cassation a cass\u00e9 l\u2019arr\u00eat des juges du fond notamment sur ce point\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">(Cass. soc. 2-5-2024 n\u00b022-18.450 F-B) :<\/span><span style=\"color: black;\"> si une\u00a0sanction disciplinaire\u00a0ne peut pas intervenir plus d\u2019un mois\u00a0apr\u00e8s le jour fix\u00e9 pour l\u2019entretien pr\u00e9alable, ce d\u00e9lai peut \u00eatre d\u00e9pass\u00e9 lorsque l\u2019employeur est conduit en vertu des r\u00e8gles statutaires ou conventionnelles \u00e0 recueillir l\u2019avis d\u2019un\u00a0organisme de discipline\u00a0d\u00e8s lors qu\u2019avant l\u2019expiration du d\u00e9lai, le salari\u00e9 a \u00e9t\u00e9 inform\u00e9 de la d\u00e9cision de saisir cet\u00a0organisme. Il en r\u00e9sulte qu\u2019apr\u00e8s avis du conseil de discipline ou renonciation du salari\u00e9 au b\u00e9n\u00e9fice de la garantie institu\u00e9e \u00e0 son profit, l\u2019employeur dispose d\u2019un\u00a0nouveau d\u00e9lai d\u2019un mois\u00a0pour sanctionner le salari\u00e9<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"ql-align-justify\"><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/juri\/id\/JURITEXT000049510328?init=true&#038;page=1&#038;query=22-18.450&#038;searchField=ALL&#038;tab_selection=all\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/juri\/id\/JURITEXT000049510328?init=true&#038;page=1&#038;query=22-18.450&#038;searchField=ALL&#038;tab_selection=all<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Dans une esp\u00e8ce ayant donn\u00e9 lieu \u00e0 un arr\u00eat de la Cour de cassation du 2 mai 2024, la salari\u00e9e, engag\u00e9e par la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 A. F., avait \u00e9t\u00e9 inform\u00e9e, par lettre du 16 d\u00e9cembre 2016, de la saisine du conseil de discipline et avait \u00e9t\u00e9 convoqu\u00e9e devant cette instance le 12 janvier 2017. Par lettre [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":25087,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_seopress_robots_follow":"","_seopress_robots_imageindex":"","_seopress_robots_snippet":"","_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_robots_breadcrumbs":"","_seopress_robots_freeze_modified_date":"","_seopress_robots_custom_modified_date":"","_seopress_robots_canonical":"","_seopress_social_fb_title":"","_seopress_social_fb_desc":"","_seopress_social_fb_img":"","_seopress_social_fb_img_attachment_id":0,"_seopress_social_fb_img_width":0,"_seopress_social_fb_img_height":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_title":"","_seopress_social_twitter_desc":"","_seopress_social_twitter_img":"","_seopress_social_twitter_img_attachment_id":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_img_width":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_img_height":0,"_seopress_redirections_value":"","_seopress_redirections_enabled":"","_seopress_redirections_enabled_regex":"","_seopress_redirections_logged_status":"","_seopress_redirections_param":"","_seopress_redirections_type":0,"_seopress_analysis_target_kw":"","_seopress_news_disabled":"","_seopress_video_disabled":"","_seopress_video":[],"_seopress_pro_schemas_manual":[],"_seopress_pro_rich_snippets_disable_all":"","_seopress_pro_rich_snippets_disable":[],"_seopress_pro_schemas":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[31],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-25089","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-actualites-en-droit-social"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25089","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=25089"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25089\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/25087"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=25089"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=25089"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=25089"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}