{"id":27468,"date":"2025-07-07T10:14:31","date_gmt":"2025-07-07T08:14:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/?p=27468"},"modified":"2025-07-07T10:14:32","modified_gmt":"2025-07-07T08:14:32","slug":"recevabilite-de-laction-en-contestation-dexpertise","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/recevabilite-de-laction-en-contestation-dexpertise\/","title":{"rendered":"Recevabilit\u00e9 de l&rsquo;action en contestation d&rsquo;expertise"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">Dans un pr\u00e9c\u00e9dent arr\u00eat du 5 f\u00e9vrier 2025 (n\u00b022-21.892), la Cour de cassation avait eu l&rsquo;occasion de se prononcer sur le point de d\u00e9part de l&rsquo;action en contestation d&rsquo;expertise vot\u00e9e par le Comit\u00e9 Social et Economique (voir notre actu du 11 f\u00e9vrier 2025).<\/span><\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">Dans un nouvel arr\u00eat du 25 juin 2025 (n\u00b024-12.816), la Cour de cassation pr\u00e9cise qu&rsquo;en mati\u00e8re de proc\u00e9dure acc\u00e9l\u00e9r\u00e9e au fond, l&#8217;employeur saisit le juge judiciaire dans un d\u00e9lai de 10\u00a0jours, <\/span><span style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: rgb(250, 250, 250);\">la date de saisine du juge devant s&rsquo;entendre de celle de l&rsquo;assignation et non celle de son placement au greffe.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">Ce n&rsquo;est donc pas la date du d\u00e9p\u00f4t au greffe du Tribunal judiciaire d&rsquo;une copie de cette assignation (autrement dit placement ou enr\u00f4lement) qui compte, mais bien la date d&rsquo;assignation du Comit\u00e9 Social et Economique par voie de Commissaire de justice.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">La Cour de cassation avait d\u00e9j\u00e0 eu l&rsquo;occasion de se prononcer en ce sens : c\u2019est la date d\u2019assignation, et non celle du d\u00e9p\u00f4t au greffe, qui marque la saisine du Tribunal judiciaire, statuant en proc\u00e9dure acc\u00e9l\u00e9r\u00e9e au fond (Cass. soc., 9 oct. 2024, n\u00b023-11.339).<\/span><\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/685ce25b0c5506317f3be850?judilibre_juridiction=cc&#038;judilibre_chambre%5b%5d=soc&#038;previousdecisionpage=0&#038;previousdecisionindex=1&#038;nextdecisionpage=0&#038;nextdecisionindex=3\" target=\"_blank\">https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/685ce25b0c5506317f3be850?judilibre_juridiction=cc&#038;judilibre_chambre[]=soc&#038;previousdecisionpage=0&#038;previousdecisionindex=1&#038;nextdecisionpage=0&#038;nextdecisionindex=3<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Dans un pr\u00e9c\u00e9dent arr\u00eat du 5 f\u00e9vrier 2025 (n\u00b022-21.892), la Cour de cassation avait eu l&rsquo;occasion de se prononcer sur le point de d\u00e9part de l&rsquo;action en contestation d&rsquo;expertise vot\u00e9e par le Comit\u00e9 Social et Economique (voir notre actu du 11 f\u00e9vrier 2025). Dans un nouvel arr\u00eat du 25 juin 2025 (n\u00b024-12.816), la Cour de [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":27466,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_seopress_analysis_target_kw":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[31],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-27468","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-actualites-en-droit-social"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27468","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=27468"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27468\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":27471,"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27468\/revisions\/27471"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/27466"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=27468"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=27468"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=27468"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}