{"id":27706,"date":"2025-09-19T14:30:14","date_gmt":"2025-09-19T12:30:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/?p=27706"},"modified":"2025-09-19T14:41:42","modified_gmt":"2025-09-19T12:41:42","slug":"le-conseil-constitutionnel-tranche-pas-dobligation-dinformer-le-salarie-de-son-droit-de-se-taire","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/le-conseil-constitutionnel-tranche-pas-dobligation-dinformer-le-salarie-de-son-droit-de-se-taire\/","title":{"rendered":"Le Conseil constitutionnel tranche : pas d\u2019obligation d\u2019informer le salari\u00e9 de son droit de se taire lors de l&rsquo;entretien pr\u00e9alable!"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Le 19 septembre 2025, le Conseil constitutionnel a rendu une d\u00e9cision tr\u00e8s attendue (n\u00b0 2025-1160, 2025-1161 et 2025-1162 QPC) sur la conformit\u00e9 \u00e0 la Constitution des dispositions du Code du travail relatives \u00e0 l\u2019<strong>entretien pr\u00e9alable au licenciement<\/strong> (articles L.1232-2 et suivants) et \u00e0 l\u2019<strong>entretien pr\u00e9alable \u00e0 sanction disciplinaire<\/strong> (article L.1332-2).<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Le d\u00e9bat<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>Comme rappel\u00e9 dans notre pr\u00e9c\u00e9dent article, les requ\u00e9rants soutenaient que ces dispositions violaient l\u2019<strong>article 9 de la D\u00e9claration des droits de l\u2019homme et du citoyen de 1789<\/strong>, en ce qu\u2019elles ne pr\u00e9voient pas que le salari\u00e9 soit inform\u00e9 de son <strong>droit de se taire<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>Cette revendication s\u2019inscrivait dans le sillage notamment de la jurisprudence du <strong>Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat<\/strong> (CE, 19 d\u00e9c. 2024, n\u00b0 490157 et 490952), qui avait reconnu ce droit aux agents publics dans le cadre des proc\u00e9dures disciplinaires.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>La d\u00e9cision du Conseil constitutionnel<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Le Conseil constitutionnel a \u00e9cart\u00e9 cet argument. Il a consid\u00e9r\u00e9 que :<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>le licenciement pour motif personnel ou la sanction disciplinaire d\u00e9cid\u00e9s par un employeur <strong>ne constituaient pas une punition<\/strong> au sens de l\u2019article 9 de la D\u00e9claration de 1789,<\/li>\n<li>ces mesures relevaient d\u2019une <strong>relation de droit priv\u00e9<\/strong> et ne traduisaient pas l\u2019exercice de pr\u00e9rogatives de puissance publique,<\/li>\n<li>en cons\u00e9quence, le <strong>droit de se taire<\/strong> n\u2019avait pas vocation \u00e0 \u00eatre notifi\u00e9 au salari\u00e9 dans ce cadre.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>Les dispositions contest\u00e9es ont donc \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9clar\u00e9es <strong>conformes \u00e0 la Constitution<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>Cette d\u00e9cision apporte une clarification bienvenue, notamment sur les proc\u00e9dures disciplinaires en cours.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr\/decision\/2025\/20251160_1161_1162QPC.htm\" target=\"_blank\">https:\/\/www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr\/decision\/2025\/20251160_1161_1162QPC.htm<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le 19 septembre 2025, le Conseil constitutionnel a rendu une d\u00e9cision tr\u00e8s attendue (n\u00b0 2025-1160, 2025-1161 et 2025-1162 QPC) sur la conformit\u00e9 \u00e0 la Constitution des dispositions du Code du travail relatives \u00e0 l\u2019entretien pr\u00e9alable au licenciement (articles L.1232-2 et suivants) et \u00e0 l\u2019entretien pr\u00e9alable \u00e0 sanction disciplinaire (article L.1332-2). Le d\u00e9bat Comme rappel\u00e9 dans [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":27709,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_seopress_robots_follow":"","_seopress_robots_imageindex":"","_seopress_robots_snippet":"","_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_robots_breadcrumbs":"","_seopress_robots_freeze_modified_date":"","_seopress_robots_custom_modified_date":"","_seopress_robots_canonical":"","_seopress_social_fb_title":"","_seopress_social_fb_desc":"","_seopress_social_fb_img":"","_seopress_social_fb_img_attachment_id":0,"_seopress_social_fb_img_width":0,"_seopress_social_fb_img_height":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_title":"","_seopress_social_twitter_desc":"","_seopress_social_twitter_img":"","_seopress_social_twitter_img_attachment_id":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_img_width":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_img_height":0,"_seopress_redirections_value":"","_seopress_redirections_enabled":"","_seopress_redirections_enabled_regex":"","_seopress_redirections_logged_status":"","_seopress_redirections_param":"","_seopress_redirections_type":0,"_seopress_analysis_target_kw":"","_seopress_news_disabled":"","_seopress_video_disabled":"","_seopress_video":[],"_seopress_pro_schemas_manual":[],"_seopress_pro_rich_snippets_disable_all":"","_seopress_pro_rich_snippets_disable":[],"_seopress_pro_schemas":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[31],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-27706","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-actualites-en-droit-social"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27706","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=27706"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27706\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":27708,"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27706\/revisions\/27708"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/27709"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=27706"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=27706"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=27706"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}