{"id":28061,"date":"2025-12-03T12:47:01","date_gmt":"2025-12-03T11:47:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/notification-des-informations-et-droits-lors-de-laudition-du-representant-legal-dune-personne-morale\/"},"modified":"2025-12-03T12:47:03","modified_gmt":"2025-12-03T11:47:03","slug":"notification-des-informations-et-droits-lors-de-laudition-du-representant-legal-dune-personne-morale","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/notification-des-informations-et-droits-lors-de-laudition-du-representant-legal-dune-personne-morale\/","title":{"rendered":"Notification des informations et droits lors de l\u2019audition du repr\u00e9sentant l\u00e9gal d\u2019une personne morale"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"ql-align-justify\"><span style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">Dans un arr\u00eat du 25 novembre 2025, la Chambre criminelle de la Cour de cassation a remis en cause la motivation de juges du fond ayant rejet\u00e9 la nullit\u00e9 soulev\u00e9e par une personne morale d\u2019une audition\u00a0de son repr\u00e9sentant l\u00e9gal, tir\u00e9e du d\u00e9faut de notification des informations pr\u00e9vues par l\u2019article 61-1 du Code de proc\u00e9dure p\u00e9nale (notamment la qualification, <\/span><span style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: rgb(250, 250, 250);\">la date et le lieu pr\u00e9sum\u00e9s de l&rsquo;infraction<\/span><span style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\"> recherch\u00e9e), qui avait eu lieu pendant une enqu\u00eate pr\u00e9liminaire<\/span><span style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: rgb(250, 250, 250);\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"ql-align-justify\"><span style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"ql-align-justify\"><span style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">Pour les juges du fond, ces informations n\u2019avaient pas \u00eatre notifi\u00e9es au repr\u00e9sentant l\u00e9gal de la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 concern\u00e9e lors de cette audition qui intervenait \u00e0 une p\u00e9riode de l\u2019enqu\u00eate p\u00e9nale o\u00f9 cette derni\u00e8re n\u2019\u00e9tait pas encore poursuivie devant une juridiction p\u00e9nale de jugement, d\u00e8s lors que l\u2019article 706-44 du Code de proc\u00e9dure pr\u00e9voyait que \u00ab\u00a0<\/span><em style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">Le repr\u00e9sentant de la personne morale poursuivie ne peut, en cette qualit\u00e9, faire l&rsquo;objet d&rsquo;aucune mesure de contrainte autre que celle applicable au t\u00e9moin<\/em><span style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">\u00a0\u00bb.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"ql-align-justify\"><span style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"ql-align-justify\"><span style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">Cette position est contredite par la Cour de cassation qui rappelle que l<\/span><span style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: rgb(250, 250, 250);\">es informations pr\u00e9vues par l&rsquo;article 61-1 du code de proc\u00e9dure p\u00e9nale doivent \u00eatre d\u00e9livr\u00e9es \u00e0 toute personne entendue dans le cadre d&rsquo;une enqu\u00eate pr\u00e9liminaire \u00e0 l&rsquo;encontre de laquelle existent des raisons plausibles de soup\u00e7onner la commission d&rsquo;une infraction, qu&rsquo;il s&rsquo;agisse d&rsquo;une personne physique ou d&rsquo;une personne morale, ce qui semblait \u00eatre le cas en l&rsquo;esp\u00e8ce.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"ql-align-justify\"><\/p>\n<p class=\"ql-align-justify\"><span style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: rgb(250, 250, 250);\">Pour autant, la Haute juridiction ne censure pas la d\u00e9cision des juges du fond, en consid\u00e9rant que l&rsquo;audition critiqu\u00e9e n&rsquo;a pas \u00e9t\u00e9 le support exclusif ni m\u00eame essentiel de la d\u00e9claration de culpabilit\u00e9 de la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 pr\u00e9venue\u2026 La condamnation de cette derni\u00e8re pour l&rsquo;infraction recherch\u00e9e est ainsi confirm\u00e9e.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/69254c39bbc24b0cc5e085f7\" target=\"_blank\">https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/69254c39bbc24b0cc5e085f7<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Dans un arr\u00eat du 25 novembre 2025, la Chambre criminelle de la Cour de cassation a remis en cause la motivation de juges du fond ayant rejet\u00e9 la nullit\u00e9 soulev\u00e9e par une personne morale d\u2019une audition\u00a0de son repr\u00e9sentant l\u00e9gal, tir\u00e9e du d\u00e9faut de notification des informations pr\u00e9vues par l\u2019article 61-1 du Code de proc\u00e9dure p\u00e9nale [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":28059,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_seopress_robots_follow":"","_seopress_robots_imageindex":"","_seopress_robots_snippet":"","_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_robots_breadcrumbs":"","_seopress_robots_freeze_modified_date":"","_seopress_robots_custom_modified_date":"","_seopress_robots_canonical":"","_seopress_social_fb_title":"","_seopress_social_fb_desc":"","_seopress_social_fb_img":"","_seopress_social_fb_img_attachment_id":0,"_seopress_social_fb_img_width":0,"_seopress_social_fb_img_height":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_title":"","_seopress_social_twitter_desc":"","_seopress_social_twitter_img":"","_seopress_social_twitter_img_attachment_id":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_img_width":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_img_height":0,"_seopress_redirections_value":"","_seopress_redirections_enabled":"","_seopress_redirections_enabled_regex":"","_seopress_redirections_logged_status":"","_seopress_redirections_param":"","_seopress_redirections_type":0,"_seopress_analysis_target_kw":"","_seopress_news_disabled":"","_seopress_video_disabled":"","_seopress_video":[],"_seopress_pro_schemas_manual":[],"_seopress_pro_rich_snippets_disable_all":"","_seopress_pro_rich_snippets_disable":[],"_seopress_pro_schemas":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[31],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-28061","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-actualites-en-droit-social"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28061","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=28061"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28061\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":28063,"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28061\/revisions\/28063"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/28059"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=28061"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=28061"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.voltaire-avocats.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=28061"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}